Kanavano 32700 3.2V 6000mAh lifepo4 rechargeable battery cell LiFePO4 5C discharge battery for LED Flashlights Emergency lights ► Photo 1/4
Kanavano 32700 3.2V 6000mAh lifepo4 rechargeable battery cell LiFePO4 5C discharge battery for LED Flashlights Emergency lights ► Photo 1/4
Kanavano 32700 3.2V 6000mAh lifepo4 rechargeable battery cell LiFePO4 5C discharge battery for LED Flashlights Emergency lights ► Photo 2/4
Kanavano 32700 3.2V 6000mAh lifepo4 rechargeable battery cell LiFePO4 5C discharge battery for LED Flashlights Emergency lights ► Photo 3/4

Photos of buyers

Kanavano 32700 3.2V 6000mAh lifepo4 rechargeable battery cell LiFePO4 5C discharge battery for LED Flashlights Emergency lights

Seller:
Alitools rating:
23%
/
Aliexpress rating:
80%
4.14 $
4   orders
/
2   reviews
Rating: 4

Price history

Price drop notification

Out telegram bot will notify you once the price drops to the desirable one

This item is from other sellers

Customer Reviews

A***y
June 28, 2020

Batteries are different from the picture. No printed markings or labels on them, traces of corrosion are on the bottom plate, and dirt particles left belhind the blue foil. When charging, 3 of them was heating up during the process, up to 35-40 degree. Only one of them remained cool, as expected. Charging current was 1.6A DC (not pulsed) only. Also the self-discharge rates are too high: voltages are decreasing day-by-day, by approx. 10mV in every two to three days. Seller refused to replace them, dispute was initiated. The judgement that passed,was sending them back an receive refund. This is not realistic, however. Return cost would be more than the value of the goods itself ($22.43), so that would just increase the losses. Unfair decision, and no way to protest against it.

A***y
June 28, 2020

Batteries are different from the picture. No printed markings or labels on them, traces of corrosion are on the bottom plate, and dirt particles left belhind the blue foil. When charging, 3 of them was heating up during the process, up to 35-40 degree. Only one of them remained cool, as expected. Charging current was 1.6A DC (not pulsed) only. Also the self-discharge rates are too high: voltages are decreasing day-by-day, by approx. 10mV in every two to three days. Seller refused to replace them, dispute was initiated. The judgement that passed,was sending them back an receive refund. This is not realistic, however. Return cost would be more than the value of the goods itself ($22.43), so that would just increase the losses. Unfair decision, and no way to protest against it.

Anonymous